Bug#668861: gcc-defaults: FTBFS on ppc64: gccgo is not effective on ppc64

2012-04-14 Thread Hiroyuki Yamamoto
Source: gcc-defaults Version: 1.116 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please make gccgo effective on ppc64. Regards, -- Hiroyuki Yamamoto A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC diff -Nurd gcc-defaults-1.116.orig/debian/rules gcc-defaults-1.116/debian/rules --- gcc-defaults-1.116.orig/de

Processed: tagging 668426

2012-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 668426 + pending Bug #668426 [src:gcc-4.7] gcc-4.7: Add support for Ada for GNU/Hurd Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 668426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Results for 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-3) testsuite on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu

2012-04-14 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 6 20:42:29 UTC 2012 (revision 186200) Target: mipsel-linux-gnu gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-3) Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lineno-simple1.C scan-assembler main:[^

Re: Handling GCC-related orphan bugs

2012-04-14 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2012/4/14, Matthias Klose : > I think any reassigments would be wrong. It needs somebody to go through the > list of bugs to see if these are fixed. if yes, close them, if not, then > reassign them to the package they can be reproduced with. Do you volunteer > to do this? I can try. But I'm leav

Re: Handling GCC-related orphan bugs

2012-04-14 Thread Matthias Klose
On 14.04.2012 13:14, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: Hello I noticed that there are these orphan bugs (no maintainer set, the package that they are filed against is not present in Debian anymore). Perhaps there are some false positives or missing ones. They were gathered from [1], and the

Handling GCC-related orphan bugs

2012-04-14 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hello I noticed that there are these orphan bugs (no maintainer set, the package that they are filed against is not present in Debian anymore). Perhaps there are some false positives or missing ones. They were gathered from [1], and the ones related to GCC are filteerd and pasted in the attached

Bug#631727: marked as done (gdc: Request to package D2 front end for gcc)

2012-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:02:13 +0100 with message-id and subject line Closing obsolete/orphan bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #631727, regarding gdc: Request to package D2 front end for gcc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#631135: marked as done (Support D version 2)

2012-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:02:13 +0100 with message-id and subject line Closing obsolete/orphan bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #631135, regarding Support D version 2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i