Bug#670578: More information needed

Hello, Is there an upstream bug for that? If there is, can you please provide a reference? Can you post a stack trace, preferrably obtained with the latest Debian binaries (gnunet version 0.8.1b-8), if possible? Thanks. -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org

Processed: bug 669858 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01809.html

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 669858 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01809.html Bug #669858 [lib64gcc1] missing symbols in /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01809.html'. > thanks Stopping

Processed (with 1 errors): Bug#669858: eglibc FTBFS on mips and mipsel, Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures:

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 669858 lib64gcc1 4.7.0-4 Bug #669858 [src:eglibc] eglibc FTBFS on mips and mipsel, Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures: Bug reassigned from package 'src:eglibc' to 'lib64gcc1'. No longer marked as found in versions

Re: Bug#669858: eglibc FTBFS on mips and mipsel, Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures:

reassign 669858 lib64gcc1 4.7.0-4 retitle 669858 missing symbols in /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 tag 669858 + upstream forward 669858 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01809.html affects 669858 eglibc thanks On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 01:07:00PM +0100, peter green wrote: > Package: eglibc > Severi