Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> We're now at gcc 4.7 for most architectures, the freeze is close and
> >> gcc-doc still depends on gcc-4.4-doc.
>
> > ... because there doesn't seem to exist any gcc-4.x-doc package with
> > x >= 5. *puzzled*
>
> Isn't the GCC documentation now non-free?
It was
Hello
I will certainly build-depend on gcc-4.6 for now. However I am very
dubious as to gcc47 quality:
from one debian version to another it breaks packages, it generates
buggy codes. It just doesn't seem
very reliable and production ready.
Best regards
C.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Touko
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:41:41PM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> reassign 676729 gcc-4.7 4.7.0-12
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Christophe Prud'homme
> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I get an ice with gcc47 (see email below)
> >
> > I am trying to reproduce it.
> > Shouldn't it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 676729 gcc-4.7 4.7.0-12
Bug #676729 [src:feel++] feel++: FTBFS: operators.hpp:722:1: internal compiler
error: Segmentation fault
Bug reassigned from package 'src:feel++' to 'gcc-4.7'.
No longer marked as found in versions feel++/0.91.4-2
Dear Gcc maintainers,
gcc47 -12 breaks feel++ compilation.
it generates ices and sometimes generates new compiling errors that
-11 didn't have.
I am very distressed to have this kind of unstable compiler behavior
and especially at a time where I don't have much time to
work on my packages.
Best
Axel Beckert writes:
> Axel Beckert wrote:
>> We're now at gcc 4.7 for most architectures, the freeze is close and
>> gcc-doc still depends on gcc-4.4-doc.
> ... because there doesn't seem to exist any gcc-4.x-doc package with
> x >= 5. *puzzled*
Isn't the GCC documentation now non-free?
--
R
reopen 673749
thanks
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> severity 673749 important
> Bug #673749 {Done: Matthias Klose } [g++-4.7] g++-4.7: gcc47
> generates buggy code with optimisation flags
> Severity set
Hello
I get an ice with gcc47 (see email below)
I am trying to reproduce it.
Shouldn't it be considered a gcc47 bug rather than a feel++ bug ?
Feel++ compiles and runs fine with gcc45, gcc46 and clang31.
Best regards
C.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lucas Nussbaum
Date: Sat, Ju
Hi,
I was too quick with replying:
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Christian Ohm wrote on 14-Mar-2011:
> > As the subject says, gcc-doc is still depending on the old docs.
>
> Any news here?
>
> We're now at gcc 4.7 for most architectures, the freeze is close and
> gcc-doc still depends on gcc-4.4-doc.
Hi,
Christian Ohm wrote on 14-Mar-2011:
> As the subject says, gcc-doc is still depending on the old docs.
Any news here?
We're now at gcc 4.7 for most architectures, the freeze is close and
gcc-doc still depends on gcc-4.4-doc.
IMHO this should be fixed for Wheezy.
Regards, Ax
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:26:35 -0700
with message-id <201206100326.35851.dschep...@gmail.com>
and subject line libffi 3.0.11 is in experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #676884,
regarding libffi: New upstream version available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Source: libffi
Version: 3.0.10-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi, the current 3.0.10 Debian package builds a broken libffi library on x32,
whereas on 3.0.11 it passes the testsuite with no problems. (Although it
would require an soname bump to libffi6.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
12 matches
Mail list logo
