Am 02.10.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard: >>>> While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that >>>> this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22 >>>> packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd. >>> >>> sure, and they still will ftbfs without libphobos. >> >> There are a few others architectures which build gdc, but which do not >> build libphobos-dev. What makes kfreebsd special there, and why do we >> need this gdc -> libphobos-dev dependency (which wasn't there in >> previous versions of the package)? >> >> For me it looks like a patch like the following one will fix the >> problem: >> >> Index: rules >> =================================================================== >> --- rules (révision 7672) >> +++ rules (copie de travail) >> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ >> go_archs = amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel \ >> powerpc ppc64 ppc64el s390 s390x x32 >> >> -phobos_archs = amd64 armel armhf i386 x32 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 >> +phobos_archs = amd64 armel armhf i386 x32 >> >> ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(multilib_archs))) >> with_multilib = yes >> >> Of course having libphobos would be even better, but that can be done in >> a later step. > > As nobody shouted against my above proposal, I guess it's the way to go. > I have just committed the change to the SVN. > > Matthias could you please upload it, or if you don't have time can I > just upload it myself?
yes, on my list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/542ebfc7.3090...@debian.org