Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:39:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > but let's try to work together to fix the current situation.
That's what I tried, but... Disabling make check (as will be done)
is not "fix"ing but just hiding it.
> my moreinfo tag was removed, and I'm not interested in a b
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:39:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 28.10.19 22:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The visible progress on this bug report stopped several days ago. I'd
> > like to try an get it a bit further. I'm expecting frustration on all
> > sides,
>
> yes, an
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:17:49PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Rene, I really appreciate the fact that libreoffice has an extensive
> test suite. But just to get options on the table can you please tell us
> how severe this particular failure is? In other words, how much is this
> telling you
-15.1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Test build.
.
* Update to SVN 20191028 (r277486) from the gcc-9-branch.
- Fix PR target/92225 (x86), PR rtl-optimization/92007,
PR target/70010 (PPC), PR target/65342 (PPC), PR target/67183,
PR fortran/91926, PR fortran/91863, PR
gcc-9_9.2.1-15.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-9_9.2.1-15.1.dsc
gcc-9_9.2.1-15.1.debian.tar.xz
gcc-9_9.2.1-15.1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On 28.10.19 22:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
Dear all,
The visible progress on this bug report stopped several days ago. I'd
like to try an get it a bit further. I'm expecting frustration on all
sides,
yes, and side note that I will use the same terms of "several days ago" for a
three day silence in
Dear all,
The visible progress on this bug report stopped several days ago. I'd
like to try an get it a bit further. I'm expecting frustration on all
sides, but let's try to work together to fix the current situation. In
case you aren't aware, the fact that gcc-9 hasn't migrated to testing in
the
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 27 12:53:25 UTC 2019 (revision 277486)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== brig tests ===
Running tar
On 28.10.19 14:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#943393: gcc-9-cross: FTBFS: libatomic.so.1, needed by ./libgnat-9.so, not found
It has been closed by Matthias Klose .
* Link libgnatvsn against libatomic.
This bug was filed against gcc-9
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #943393: gcc-9-cross: FTBFS: libatomic.so.1, needed by ./libgnat-9.so, not
> found
>
> It has been closed by Matthias Klose .
> * Link libgnatvsn against libatomic.
>
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:28:07 +0100
Source: autofdo
Architecture: source
Version: 0.19-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
Changes:
autofdo (0.19-2) uns
autofdo_0.19-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
autofdo_0.19-2.dsc
autofdo_0.19-2.debian.tar.xz
autofdo_0.19-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:08:10 +0100
Source: gcc-9-cross-ports
Architecture: source
Version: 11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
Changes:
gcc-9-cross-po
gcc-9-cross-ports_11_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-9-cross-ports_11.dsc
gcc-9-cross-ports_11.tar.xz
gcc-9-cross-ports_11_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
14 matches
Mail list logo
