Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #976793 [src:gcc-10-cross] libgcc-s1-*-cross is Important: yes
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-10-cross' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-10-cross/10.2.0-19cross1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versi
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
According to the build logs, all lib*-*-cross packages have optional priority,
so it needs to be adjusted for the archive.
That should be done for all lib*-*-cross packages built by gcc-10-cross,
gcc-10-cross-ports, gcc-10-cross-mipsen, gcc-9-cross, gcc-9-cross
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 04:51:40PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> No, 2.36 is not required. Perfectly fine to build with 2.35.2.
That's correct.
But if you build with 2.36, what does the runtime dependency say?
Forcing binutils (>= 2.36) for both would be the easiest way
to avoid this situation.
sorry, but these are bogus reports. There's no requirement that a package has
to be binNMUable. And for the GCC cross packages it's plainly wrong. Just
building the compilers, and not the runtime libraries lets these diverge, ending
up with a mix of packages built from two different compiler vers
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:01:28 +0200
with message-id <9c7747e5-2a0b-4141-cf61-3ff0c9b52...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Incorrect Source: version generated for binary packages in
binNMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #991049,
regarding gcc-10-cross-mipsen: Incorrect Source: ve
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:01:28 +0200
with message-id <9c7747e5-2a0b-4141-cf61-3ff0c9b52...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Incorrect Source: version generated for binary packages in
binNMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #991045,
regarding gcc-10-cross-ports: Incorrect Source: ver
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:01:28 +0200
with message-id <9c7747e5-2a0b-4141-cf61-3ff0c9b52...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Incorrect Source: version generated for binary packages in
binNMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #991044,
regarding gcc-10-cross: Incorrect Source: version g
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:01:28 +0200
with message-id <9c7747e5-2a0b-4141-cf61-3ff0c9b52...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Incorrect Source: version generated for binary packages in
binNMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #991043,
regarding gcc-9-cross-ports: Incorrect Source: vers
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:01:28 +0200
with message-id <9c7747e5-2a0b-4141-cf61-3ff0c9b52...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Incorrect Source: version generated for binary packages in
binNMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #991042,
regarding gcc-9-cross: Incorrect Source: version ge
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:51:40 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: gcc-11 should (build) depend on binutils (>= 2.36)
has caused the Debian Bug report #991050,
regarding gcc-11 should (build) depend on binutils (>= 2.36)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
No, 2.36 is not required. Perfectly fine to build with 2.35.2.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 991049 src:gcc-10-cross-mipsen 3+c5
Bug #991049 [src:gcc-9-cross] gcc-10-cross-mipsen: Incorrect Source: version
generated for binary packages in binNMUs
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-9-cross' to 'src:gcc-10-cross-mipsen'.
No long
Source: gcc-11
Severity: serious
Helmut Grohne reported on IRC:
when gcc-11 is built with experimental binutils, the binary packages
do not work with unstable binutils by passing unrecognized options
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html confirms that gcc 11
might optionally use binutils 2.36
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 991042 -1
Bug #991042 [src:gcc-9-cross] gcc-9-cross: Incorrect Source: version generated
for binary packages in binNMUs
Bug 991042 cloned as bug 991049
> reassign -1 src:gcc-10-cross-mipsen gcc-10-cross-mipsen 3+c5
Unknown command or malfor
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2 -3 -4
Bug #991042 [src:gcc-9-cross] gcc-9-cross: Incorrect Source: version generated
for binary packages in binNMUs
Bug 991042 cloned as bugs 991043-991045
> reassign -2 gcc-9-cross-ports 23
Bug #991043 [src:gcc-9-cross] gcc-9-cross: Incorrect Source: ve
Source: gcc-9-cross
Version: 25
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4
Control: reassign -2 gcc-9-cross-ports 23
Control: retitle -2 gcc-9-cross-ports: Incorrect Source: version generated for
binary packages in binNMUs
Control: reassign -3 gcc-10-cross 15
Control: retitle -3 gcc-
16 matches
Mail list logo
