Claim Award!!!!!!!!

Claim Award We are informing you that your email address has won ?750,000Euros in the email electronic lotto on 09-06-2008. For details and validation,contact Mr Peter Hines. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] a)Lucky nr:5-9-19-21-38/1/7 b)Serial nr:9047HDFER C)Batch nr:3GH874HR d)Ref nr

Bug#353363: g77-3.4: collect2 linking fails when calling libc6-dev "crt1.o"

to select Debian installed version of gcc/g77 compiler.) Error messages from source builds of of gcc-3.4.5 and glibc-2.3.6 on Debian sarge are very similar. Failure always occurs with undefined references in crt1.o. Platforms are all 1686-pc-gnu-linux. TIA, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A little request

Dear devolepers, i'm writing a little program which translates music into images. I wrote the two procedures and i want them to comunicate between themselves. A friend suggest me to use the functions SendMessage() and PeekMessage() , i want some help about their syntax and semantycs. What kind of

Your account 1789989863BA Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:36:23 -0800

ation and a 24 hour approval: http://www.mbrefi.net Best Regards, Raul Eldridge http://www.mbrefi.net/book.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

downloads here

[EMAIL PROTECTED], Download anything you've ever wanted from our site: Check here for more info! Is the manager missing walking? Don't go around saying the world owes you a living; the world owes you nothing; it was here first.

Re: Oh God it's

Bonjour , Votre message a bien été reçu . Une réponse y sera apportée dans les plus brefs délais . Nous vous avisons que le Clan des Seeonee est fermé exceptionnellement du 24.11.2004 au Dimanche 28 .11.2004 inclus . Vos demandes et commandes passées durant cette période d\' absence seront trai

Bug#269228: gcc-3.3: displays error and quits when trying to compile anything

You need to install libc6-dev. gcc-3.3 does not seem to depend on libc6-dev. Is this normal? -- Ludovic Brenta. --- Tiscali ADSL LIGHT, 19,95 EUR/mois pendant 6 mois, c'est le moment de faire le pas! http://reg.tiscali.be/

Bug#269087: contains files in package libstdc++5-3.3-doc

severity 269087 grave reassign 269087 gcc-3.3 close 269087 merge 269087 268338 thanks This is the 18th duplicate of #268338. Please read the existing bug reports before submitting new ones. FYI, this bug has been closed in 3.3.4-6sarge1.2, which reached testing yesterday. -- Ludovic Brenta. -

Bug#268768: package gcc-3.3 upgrade bug

reassign 268768 gcc-3.3 reassign 268769 gcc-3.3 reassign 268770 gcc-3.3 reassign 268771 gcc-3.3 severity 268768 grave severity 268769 grave severity 268770 grave severity 268771 grave tags 268768 sarge tags 268769 sarge tags 268770 sarge tags 268771 sarge merge 268473 268768 268769 268770 268771 th

[Bug target/10700] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg on 64-bit targets

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10587] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10700] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg on 64-bit targets

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-17 15:58 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes Yes, it looks

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10587] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics with constant argument

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version

Bug#192634: [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version

Bug#186922: [Bug java/10581] ICE compiling freenet

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics with constant argument

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 19:15 --- The linux kernel must be compiled with optimization in order to work, because of design choices, so the

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 09:50 --- Do you have checking enabled? This sounds like a duplicate of part of PR 11183 on the mainline. I&#

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11194] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#188943: [Bug c++/10891] code using dynamic_cast causes segfaults when -fno-rtti is used

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10891 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity

[Bug bootstrap/11060] [3.4 regression] [arm/m68k] bootstrap error in libgcj

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11060 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/11183] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] ICE in change_address_1 (3.3) / subreg_hard_regno (3.4)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11183] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] ICE in change_address_1 (3.3) / subreg_hard_regno (3.4)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-14 15:54 --- Subject: Bug 11183 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Bug target/11183] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] ICE in change_address_1 (3.3) / subreg_hard_regno (3.4)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-14 14:20 --- Subject: Bug 11183 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes

[Bug target/11183] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] ICE in change_address_1 (3.3) / subreg_hard_regno (3.4)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-14 14:16 --- Subject: Bug 11183 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Bug target/11183] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] ICE in change_address_1 (3.3) / subreg_hard_regno (3.4)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11183] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] ICE in change_address_1 (3.3) / subreg_hard_regno (3.4)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #4217

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/9363] unused struct literal constants remain

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#186185: [Bug target/10206] [3.3/3.4 regression][arm] ICE in emit-rtl.c:change_address_1 when compiling fftw

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet

Bug#166255: [Bug target/8606] GNAT floating point optimization bug

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary

Bug#166255: [Bug target/8606] GNAT floating point optimization bug

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet

Bug#192634: [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet

Bug#161432: [Bug target/8603] [Alpha] s?addl pattern doesn't work

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8603 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet

Bug#187564: [Bug target/10692] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] miscompilation of perl with -O2 -fPIC

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-13 11:04 --- Case 1 is fixed. Case 2 is still present in gcc 3.3 and is identical as before. Case 3 is gone as gcc

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/11084] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1639

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11084 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

[Bug optimization/11054] [3.3 regression] [m68k] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#187564: [Bug target/10692] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] miscompilation of perl with -O2 -fPIC

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#185779: [Bug libstdc++/10257] libstdc++ breaks when NetBSD is build with -lc in LIB_SPEC shared

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#193049: [Bug c++/10888] [3.3/3.4 regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#192634: [Bug target/10730] [3.3 regression] [arm] -O2 generates invalid asm

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords

Bug#186185: [Bug target/10206] [3.3/3.4 regression][arm] ICE in emit-rtl.c:change_address_1 when compiling fftw

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#175478: [Bug target/9201] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1 compiling octave-2.1 on m68k-linux

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#177840: [Bug optimization/9812] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10587] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#159838: [Bug debug/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-07 23:21 --- The debug info contains x at line 1 so it looks like it is a ld (binutils bug) misreading the debug

Bug#185779: [Bug libstdc++/10257] libstdc++ breaks when NetBSD is build with -lc in LIB_SPEC shared

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10257 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-06 21:39 --- Subject: Bug#185779: libstdc++ breaks when NetBSD is build with -lc in LIB_SPEC shared While the

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-06 17:23 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-06 16:52 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-06/msg00743.html --- You are receiving this

[Bug target/11084] [mips] regression from 3.2 ICE in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1639

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11084 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11084] [mips] regression from 3.2 ICE in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1639

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11084 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-05 00:20 --- Created an attachment (id=4171) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4171&acti

Bug#121269: [Bug c/9209] [3.3 regression] cc allows dollars in identifiers by default on i386 but fails

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9209 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

[Bug target/11084] [mips] regression from 3.2 ICE in propagate_one_insn, at flow.c:1639

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11084 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 22:24 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:52

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 17:52 --- Richard, you're right, I do get the failure on arm-elf now. I'm not sure why I didn't

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 16:52 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 16:12 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:13

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] noce_process_if_block() can loose REG_INC notes

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 15:13 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 12:25 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 > Well, you're

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-02 17:34 --- Well, you're the ARM maintainer, so I suspect your analysis is much closer... Also could be be

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-02 17:09 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 Bizzare. Your analysis does

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in merge_assigned_reloads building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary

[Bug optimization/11054] [3.3 regression] [m68k] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-02 10:18 --- Created an attachment (id=4135) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4135&acti

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-02 10:29 --- *** Bug 11057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- You are receiving this mail

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#166940: [Bug target/8600] [3.3/3.4 regression] [i686] internal error using builtin shift MMX functions

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/11052] [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10587] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug optimization/11053] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE with kernel 2.4.20; sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11053 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug inline-asm/10890] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE building Linux 2.4.2x sched.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#179906: [Bug c/10892] do not Suggest attributes in ANSI mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

Bug#179906: [Bug c/10892] do not Suggest attributes in ANSI mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-01 15:18 --- Subject: Re: Bug#179906: do not Suggest attributes in ANSI mode On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 04:28:40PM

Bug#186185: [Bug target/10206] [3.3/3.4 regression][arm] ICE in emit-rtl.c:change_address_1 when compiling fftw

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-01 14:58 --- Subject: Re: Bug#186185: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression][arm] ICE in emit-rtl.c:change_address_1 when

Bug#186185: [Bug target/10206] [3.3/3.4 regression][arm] ICE in emit-rtl.c:change_address_1 when compiling fftw

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

Bug#179906: [Bug c/10892] do not Suggest attributes in ANSI mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-01 14:34 --- Subject: Re: Bug#179906: do not Suggest attributes in ANSI mode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Bug#189365: [Bug target/10587] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-01 14:38 --- Subject: Re: Bug#189365: [3.2/3.3 regression] [ia64] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg compiling libquicktime

Bug#192135: [Bug ada/10889] Convention Fortran matrices mishandled in generics

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status

Bug#121269: [Bug c/9209] [3.3 regression] cc allows dollars in identifiers by default on i386 but fails

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9209 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords

Bug#128993: [Bug libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9073 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC

Bug#193049: [Bug c++/10888] [3.3/3.4 regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords

  1   2   >