On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus
> error. Maybe this is a gcc issue?
It's probably a good idea to try gcc-snapshot and see if this has been
fixed already. In the worst cases, gcc hackers somet
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20030722-1
gcc-snapshot has two copies of tree1:
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.4/tree1 and
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/tree1. These files are identical and are not
hard or sym. linked.
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre6
Severity: minor
info gcc gives me the gccint-3.2.info file, but it would be more
logical to present gcc-3.2.info. man gcc works as expected.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux endquote 2.5.53 #2 Mon Dec 30 16:36:48
Maybe this is because gcc 2.96 is not an official release of gcc and
instead is a buggy snapshot?
What would I be expected to do if one of my packages were to trigger
bugs in gcc 2.96?
IMHO the IA64 port should stop using a broken compiler instead of
filing bugs on packages that expose bugs in it
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:24:16PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> The problem with the above code is that g++ will compile the code as if it is
> normal, and when you run it, it will just spew out a random result.
It's YOUR FAULT, not g++'s. It has the capability to warn you of
things like th
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:09:58PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: gcc272
> Version: 2.7.2.3-18
> Severity: grave
>
>
> Since unstable/testing does no longer include kernel 2.0.x (and these
> kernels won't work with the modutils in unstable/testing) it's in
> my opinion time to remove gcc272
Package: gcc-3.0-doc
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609
Severity: serious
Setting up gcc-3.0-doc (3.0-0pre010609) ...
sh: /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz: No such file or directory
install-info: read gzip -d
7 matches
Mail list logo
