On 4/19/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 02:52]:
>Do you know how the GCC developers would suggest handling vector
> types in a C structure or C++ object that are only used by functions
> called if AltiVec support was detected at ru
>
> Package: gcc-snapshot
> Version: 20060325-1
>
> I get the following build failure of libsndfile with gcc 4.2
> 20060325-1 and 20060408-1. Basically what happens is that abs()
> returns a negative number.
>
> > Automatic build of libsndfile_1.0.15-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112
> ...
> > .
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
been discussed before.
Andrew Pinski
I think this program should not terminate at all because i will
always be one greater than oldi.
I think gcc3.0 has a problem with no optimization then but since
there is later version that works gcc 3.1.1, upgrade.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
trace
ioldi
00
10check here
11
21
This has been fixed in gcc version 3.3 20020713 (experimental) at least.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Monday, July 15, 2002, at 08:30 , Bas Wijnen wrote:
class foo
{
public:
int bar ()
{
}
};
int main ()
{
foo f;
f.bar ();
return 0;
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
This is not a bug, a number in C prefix with 0 is in base 8 not base 10,
can someone close this bug?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 10:40 , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Number: 4698
Category: c
Synopsis: constant beginning with 0 as array index does not
7 matches
Mail list logo
