On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 01:01 +0100, jnqnfe wrote:
> it's actually just a couple of libreoffice dependencies specifically
> targeting 1.55 that are causing the hold up in upgrade installation
> currently (at least here on my systems).
No it seems to be much more... evolution (indirectly) depends on i
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 00:35 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> this is unfortunate, however there never was and is any commitment of
> unstable
> getting security fixes.
Sure, however reality is probably, that many people actually run
unstable as their stable systems - I woudln't be surprised if this i
Package: libstdc++6-4.6-dbg
Version: 4.6.2-7
Severity: normal
Hi.
Since some time ldconfig always complains about:
ldconfig: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.16-gdb.py is not an ELF
file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start.
Any idea?
Cheers,
Chris.
-- System Information:
D
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 22:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Well, the issue raised in LKML is that you absolutely should *not* enable
> -fstack-protector-all unless you _really_ know what you're doing, and most
> certainly not by default. It has nothing to do with -fstack-protector, ju
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 09:32 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Any idea if these patches will be merged upstream?
It's probably quite unlikely,... although I never understood why,..
Even though it's available for some architectures,.. it would improve
security at least on them.
Cheers,
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi.
Ever thought about integrating PaX [0] per default in Debian?
I'm however not sure how much this actually breaks ;)
Cheers,
Chris.
[0] http://pax.grsecurity.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
6 matches
Mail list logo
