their packages and ecosystems.
(I guess I could argue that not doing 1 or 2 is a policy violation as
libgcc-s1 takes over a file from libgcc1 without ensuring that libgcc1
is upgraded to a version without that file (or removed) and instead
relies on it being removed due circumstances, but I am
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:40:32PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 11:39 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > Attached is as far as I got in terms of a testcase. Still depends on
> > libapt as if I make the method directly available everything is fine…
>
> would it
?: …)
Note Note: I am really bad at guessing and I tend to dislike
bugreporters who do it myself, but I couldn't help it…
The subject being the biggest offender really…
So take everything I just noted with at least a bit of salt.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
¹ with the help of Juli
3 matches
Mail list logo
