Bug#653078: Missing dependency on libphobos2

Package: gdc-4.6 Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-3 Severity: normal Hi, Thanks sooo much for finally packaging gdc for D version 2!! There's a missing dependency on libphobos2-4.6-dev, however. This causes standard library references like std.compiler to fail to compile. Manually installing libphobos2-4.6

Bug#631135: Support D version 2

Package: gdc Version: 4.4.5-10 Severity: wishlist Currently, gdc as shipped in Debian only supports D version 1, which is no longer recommended for new projects by the D development team. Support for D version 2 is already in upstream gdc; it would be much appreciated if Debian could provide a gdc

Bug#630094: gdc looks for cc1d in wrong path

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 03:29:12AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > wait until -3 is built OK, thanks for the quick response! BTW, I notice that gdc ships with D version 1 support by default. Is there any plan to release a build with D version 2 support anytime soon? Thanks! --T -- To UNSUBSC

Bug#630094: gdc looks for cc1d in wrong path

Package: gdc-4.4 Version: 1.063-4.4.6-2 Severity: serious $ gdc hash.d gdc: error trying to exec 'cc1d': execvp: No such file or directory $ strace gdc hash.d execve("/usr/bin/gdc", ["gdc", "hash.d"], [/* 21 vars */]) = 0 [... snipped ...] stat("/mnt/1/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.6/cc

Bug#319309: g++-4.0 regression

Package: g++ Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: normal Hi, I've found a regression in g++-4.0 when optimization is turned on. Compile the attached example source code with: g++ -Wall -O3 -c bug.cc g++ produces the warning: bug.cc:9: warning: control may reach end of non-void function 'char* f(c

Bug#184120: Bug fixed?

Hi, I believe this has already been fixed in 1:3.2.3-0pre5 ? Thanks. T -- Too many people seek freedom but are enslaved by their seeking.

Bug#180937: g++ internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:50:43PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:14:01AM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote: [snip] > > Also, why doesn't g++ like the declaration of objects inside a switch > > statement? Is this invalid according to the C++ spec, or is

Bug#180937: g++ internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered

Package: g++ Version: 3.2.2-0 Severity: important The attached source file causes g++ to report an internal compiler error: % g++ -c g++bug.cc g++bug.cc: In function `int main(int, char**)': g++bug.cc:29: jump to case label g++bug.cc:26: crosses initialization of `someclass obj1' g++bug.cc:33: