Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-16
Severity: normal
Hello,
one very useful feature of gcc is, that it warns you when you produce
unterminated strings by using too long initialisers. Unfortunately
the warning only kicks in, if the initialiser is at least two bytes
longer than the string buffer.
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-dev
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: minor
Hello,
the long package description of libstdc++6-4.0-dev, revision 4.0.1-2,
contains the paragraph
This package contains the headers and static library files
necessary for building C++ programs which use libstdc++. Be
advi
Hi Matthias,
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:48:10PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> unreproducible. 3.3, 3.4 and 4.0 (experimental) show:
>
> $ gcc -c kaputt.c
> kaputt.c:1983: error: invalid register name for 'current'
The internal compiler error occurs for me only on powerpc.
On an i386 system I ge
Hi,
I got a chance to check my test case with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-3.3:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] gcc-3.4 -O -c kaputt.c
kaputt.c: In function `unionfs_readdir':
kaputt.c:9166: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 362 359 365 21 (set (mem:QI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 175) 4) [0 S1 A8])
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-5
Severity: normal
Hello,
I encountered an internal compiler error in gcc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/compier] gcc -O -c kaputt.c
kaputt.c: In function `unionfs_readdir':
kaputt.c:9166: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 365 362 368 21 0x31389d40 (set (
Hello,
I suggest to simply close bug #119952 and friends. It is tagged
wontfix and you won't get many new copies, because gcc-3.0 becomes out
of fashion, now.
I hope this helps,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathe
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:39:42PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> The library is definitely /not/ "version 4". ...
Ok, I see. Sorry for all the confusion.
I will close the bug.
Jochen
pgp79D79kRpjz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
after some discussion with Florian Weimer I came
to the conclusion, that my complaint may not make
sense. Does it?
Maybe the package description should nevertheless
be changed to something like "The GNU stdc++
library version 3.1" or "The GNU stdc++ library
for gcc-3.1".
What do you thin
Package: libstdc++4
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: minor
Hello,
there seems to be a mistake in the short package description
of libstdc++4. It reads
Description: The GNU stdc++ library version 3
where it should read "... version 4".
Jochen
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architectu
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I think it would be nice, if the different
flavours of gcc would use the alternatives
system provided by `update-alternatives'.
So the system administrator could choose between
gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 in an easy way. Would this
be possi
10 matches
Mail list logo
