Re: IA-64: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96

2001-12-07 Thread John R. Daily
Concern over unforeseen consequences, and the fact that there is now in fact a newer g77-2.96 that works better, means that 2.96 will likely continue to be the default for ia64. Objective C, on the other hand, no longer exists in 2.96 on ia64 at all. -- John R. Daily

Bug#119844: gcc: __WORDSIZE definition missing

2001-11-27 Thread John R. Daily
I haven't seen any reponse from Ben, so I'm going to go ahead and move the bug to glibc. It would be rather unfortunate if this isn't fixed for woody, but at this point that may be impossible. -- John R. DailyProgeny Linux Sys

Re: Bug#119844: gcc: __WORDSIZE definition missing

2001-11-16 Thread John R. Daily
usually rely on headers to supply that info, IIRC (they definitely do on > linux targets). I should have provided more information. The bits/wordsize.h is included in a part of the file that is excluded for __GNUC__ >= 2. Judging by your response, then, this should be redir

Bug#119844: gcc: __WORDSIZE definition missing

2001-11-16 Thread John R. Daily
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.96-10 Severity: normal If glibc is to be believed (/usr/include/limits.h), gcc should be defining __WORDSIZE. gcc versions 2.95, 2.96, and 3.0 have been tested; none of them seem to define it. As it is, there doesn't seem to be a good way to distinguish 32 bit from 64 b

IA-64: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96

2001-11-14 Thread John R. Daily
larly crucial in this matter. Any thoughts? --- Forwarded Message From: "John R. Daily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-ia64@lists.debian.org Subject: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96 Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:42:48 -0500 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] During the porting process, I have com

Re: Bug#118087: operation behavior not a bug...

2001-11-06 Thread John R. Daily
That makes sense, thanks. That's the key piece I was missing. -- John R. DailyProgeny Linux Systems Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Master of the ephemeral epiphany

Re: Bug#118087: operation behavior not a bug...

2001-11-05 Thread John R. Daily
architecture (hppa), with the same compiler (g++ 3.0.2), and essentially the same code. Please see the original test code attached to the Debian bug report. One header file provokes the compiler error, but the other doesn't. -- John R. Daily

Bug#118087: operation behavior not a bug...

2001-11-05 Thread John R. Daily
considered a bug. Ignoring the question of whether unsigned int should be a valid type, how is it that two different header files with the same declaration for operator[] compile differently? -- John R. DailyProgeny Linux S

Bug#118087: hppa operator overloading problem

2001-11-02 Thread John R. Daily
Package: g++-3.0 Version: 3.0.2-10 This error is preventing ftpgrab from compiling on hppa. The test cases below do not exhibit the same behavior on ia64. fgfilegrab.cc:75: choosing `char FGString::operator[](unsigned int) const' over `operator[]' fgfilegrab.cc:75: because worst conversion f

Bug#114210: g77: Segfault while compiling r-base on ia64

2001-10-02 Thread John R. Daily
Package: g77 Version: 2:2.96-8 Severity: important While trying to build r-base on ia64, encountered the following: make[5]: Entering directory `/scratch/home/jdaily/packages/r-base/r-base-1.3.1/src/modules/lapack' gcc -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAV

Bug#111909: gcc: Objective-C does not work on ia64

2001-09-10 Thread John R. Daily
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.96-8 Severity: important After installing gobjc-2.96 on ia64, I tried to compile a simple objective-C program: > gcc -lobjc main.m printer.m -o test gcc: main.m: Objective-C compiler not installed on this system gcc: printer.m: Objective-C compiler not installed on this