reopen 751024
thanks
Sorry. Instead of closing bug 743716, I closed this one by accident. I am
reopening the bug.
raju
forwarded 684635 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54363
tags 684635 + upstream
thanks
I am able to reproduce the ICE in gcc 4.7.1-2, 4.6.2-12. The ICE does
not occur with 4.4.7-1
thanks
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists
reported it upstream as http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45724
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik4vmuu_uy+-kvhw5yfw4wbxx_wdhm3y_rtf...
I see this in gfortran 4.6.0 20100828 (from gcc-snapshot) as well.
debian_chroot:sid:kusumanchi:/# /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Targe
Hi Brendon,
This bug seems to be fixed in >= gcc-4.4 . I tried it with gcc 4.4.5
20100909, also with gcc-snapshot 4.6.0 20100828.
gcc-4.4 -c -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time sched.i
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time sched.i
and there is no ICE. The sched.i is downloaded from
http:
> Please submit a full bug report.
> See for instructions.
Please go through that file and provide all the required information.
In particular you need to attach the preprocessed file (*.i*) that
triggers the bug, generated by adding -save-temps to the complete
compilation command.
thanks
raju
> Ok. I installed the gcc-snapshot package inside a sid chroot on my
> machine. I can reproduce this bug using the latest gcc-snapshot
> package as well.
>
reported the bug upstream http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45651
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:58 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> please recheck with gcc-4.5 (experimental) and gcc-snapshot (unstable)
>>
>
> Can't upgrade to gcc-4.5 on this machine. May be someone else c
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please recheck with gcc-4.5 (experimental) and gcc-snapshot (unstable)
>
Can't upgrade to gcc-4.5 on this machine. May be someone else can help.
raju
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.5-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I am able to reproduce the bug in g++-4.4 as well
$g++ --version
g++ (Debian 4.4.4-8) 4.4.5 20100728 (prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.5-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I can reproduce the problem with g++-4.4 available in squeeze
$g++ --version
g++ (Debian 4.4.4-8) 4.4.5 20100728 (prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> If someone wants to reproduce this error, you'll find the sources either
> on lmms.sf.net or here:
> http://www.der-winnie.de/~winnie/lmms/lmms_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz
I am not able to access this link.
raju
--
Ming Hua wrote:
> The first package I tried is refblas3. I did some minimal and
> incomplete change (the shlibs is definitely wrong, for example) and
> successfully built the BLAS library, but then one of the tests failed
> so the package FTBFS. The error is:
>
> awk '/fail/ || /FAIL/ {exit 1
On 5/26/06, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
works for me; please make sure that your mirror is up to date, elsetry to find out why it's uninstallable. dselect might help to findthat out.There is some problem which I am not able to pin point. I am using uptodate mirrors. I tried using dsel
Package: gfortran-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-4
Severity: normal
gfortran-4.1 is currently uninstallable on Sid. The exact errors I am getting
are
$wajig install gfortran-4.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
re
Actually, while submitting the bug report I was not very sure if the
bug is in gcc-snapshot or some other package. So, I asked in the
debian-user mailing list the exact question. Brian Nelson replied to
it saying that the problem could be with gcc-snapshot. The
corresponding thread could be found a
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20050319-1
Severity: normal
While building mpich2 from sources using gcc-snapshot, I am getting the
following warnings.
dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type i486-linux-gnu,
falling back to default (native compilation)
dpkg-architecture: warning: Spec
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:45:36 -0600, Zach Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2005, at 7:53 PM, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
>
> > I saw that the files on
> > http://torvalds.cs.mtsu.e
> wget http://torvalds.cs.mtsu.edu/~zach/debian/1.0.1/mpich2_1.0.1-1.diff.gz \
> http://torvalds.cs.mtsu.edu/~zach/debian/1.0.1/mpich2_1.0.1-1.dsc \
> http://torvalds.cs.mtsu.edu/~zach/debian/1.0.1/mpich2_1.0.1-1_i386.deb \
> http://torvalds.cs.mtsu.edu/~zach/debian/1.0.1/mpich2_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
>
Hi experts
I am a newbie when it comes to compiling sources the debian way. So
please bear with me for this stupid question. I wanted to compile
mpich2 using gfortran and gcc. gfortran currently is available only in
gcc-snapshot package. So I am using gcc-snapshot package to build the
packages (
Hi all
Apologies for the cross posting. But I think the issue is relevant to
all the addresses included.
I am a fortran programmer and would really like to see gfortran in
gcc-snapshot package. I searched through the bug reports and found
that
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2846
21 matches
Mail list logo
