Am 13.02.21 um 22:56 schrieb Phil Morrell:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 05:02:19PM +0100, Karsten wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> makes it sense to try a retest with the current Bullseye?
> Yes please, as I believe it's been fixed already.
It's done with good and bad
Hi Phil,
makes it sense to try a retest with the current Bullseye?
Am 13.02.21 um 14:13 schrieb Phil Morrell:
> Hi Karsten, I'm afraid I can't reproduce this issue on a minimal
> installation, so either it's fixed or requires some other combination of
> packages.
> --
> Phil Morrell (emorrp1)
The correct count is 1295 packages that where not correct upgraded.
A new try to upgrade fails with this message:
# apt-get upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig
Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird ber
I tried everything.
With aptitude the process did not end and was killed with Ctrl-C:
# aptitude upgrade
Auflösen der Abhängigkeiten ...
offen: 91831;
geschlossen: 108907;
zurückgestellt: 353;
Konflikte:3108 (there are 3108 conflicts!)
I think after an reboot this installation
Package: libgcc-8-dev
Version: 8.3.0-6
Severity: important
Hello,
i try to upgrade an copy of Debian Buster on another partition to Debian
Bullseye, but it fails with this message:
(sorry i don't know how to switch the output to english)
# apt-get dist-upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fert
robably
talking about a timeframe of "sometime in 2019".
I'm CCing the debian-riscv list in case somebody there should
have further insights regarding riscv32 support in glibc.
Regards,
Karsten
--
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie der
s !mipsel
!mips64el !powerpc !powerpcspe !ppc64 !ppc64el !sh4)LIBFFI_COMPLEX_7.0
3.3~20170512
+#MISSING: 3.3~20180131-2# (symver|arch=!hppa !ia64 !m68k
!sh4)LIBFFI_GO_CLOSURE_7.0 3.3~20170512
Regards,
Karsten
--
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie d
dding the conflicts
rule would only be the easiest, but not the best method. On the other
hand, one might consider a v0 library preliminary enough that noone has
linked to it anyway. Hmm.
--
Karsten Tinnefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silberknapp 68
8 matches
Mail list logo
