ould have been fixed in the Debian bug
#447426, but has shown its ugly face again! :-(
This bug is significant since it blocks the migration of this package
and several other packages to testing. So, I'd appreciate help with
it.
Thanks in advance.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Ho
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-19 17:41]:
> > I have reason to believe that lam, which was uploaded to unstable to
> > use gfortran after this bug was found, is also affected by this bug,
&g
/fetch.cgi?pkg=lam&arch=alpha&ver=7.1.2-1.2&stamp=1202605929&file=log&as=raw
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
these cases.
Many thanks!
Kumar
P.S. 1. Please CC me, as I am not in the list.
2. The above seems to be related to PR33410, which Martin Michlmayr
has been following up. Could you confirm, please, Martin?
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai
Matthias Klose writes:
> I did have a look at Camm's packages on p.d.o., fixed some obvious
> things and uploaded those to unstable; Camm did change all package
> names and the soname of all libraries, such that these packages do not
> conflict with the existing packages in unstable, therefore the
forwarded 441481 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33382
tags 441481 +upstream
thankyou
Dear Debian GCC team,
FYI, the bug is confirmed upstream as well. So, I am tagging it
appropriately.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
6 matches
Mail list logo
