Bug#133574: other/9081: gcc doesn't diagnose, that the compiler exceeds a compiler limit

2003-01-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Synopsis: gcc doesn't diagnose, that the compiler exceeds a compiler limit > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: rth > State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 26 09:39:58 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > This isn't a compiler problem. There is no compiler limit that > has been

Bug#133574: gcc: gcc generates incorrect executables if huge static arrays are used

2002-02-13 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > In its previous incarnation, bug was hidden by going to new gcc > > version... But it looks like it only raised a bar a bit. > > This is really a bug in your code; you are exceeding a compiler limit, > thus the code behaves undefined. There is a bug in the compiler also: > the compiler sh

Bug#133574: gcc: gcc generates incorrect executables if huge static arrays are used

2002-02-12 Thread Pavel Machek
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-9 Severity: normal -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux atrey 2.2.20 #4 Tue Nov 6 15:21:30 CET 2001 i586 unknown Versions of the packages gcc depends on: ii cpp2.95.4-9 The GNU C preprocessor. ii cpp-2.95

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > reassign 130591 binutils > thanks > > I'm reassigning this to binutils. Chris, seems to be a woody-only > bug... Hold on, apt-get install gcc binutils fixed that on the woody. So it probably *used to be* binutils bug ;-). Pav

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > You'll also note that my versions are later than yours. Please update > yourself, as the problem does not exist in relatively current unstable. I did apt-get install binutils gcc on the school machine, and problem went away, so it seems newer versions fix that.

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > > > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > |Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version Description > +++--===

Bug#130591: gcc: gcc produces broken executable big static arrays are in use

2002-01-23 Thread Pavel Machek
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-9 Severity: normal -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux amd 2.5.2 #92 Sun Jan 20 23:25:47 CET 2002 i686 unknown Versions of the packages gcc depends on: ii cpp2.95.4-9 The GNU C preprocessor. ii cpp-2.95 2.95.4-0