--- Comment #18 from herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au 2006-01-10
23:45 ---
Subject: Re: Redundant reloading from stack frame on i386
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:44:21PM -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #17 from steven at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #16 from herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au 2006-01-10
23:41 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:36:51PM -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> So, closing as INVALID, i.e.
--- Comment #14 from herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au 2006-01-10
23:25 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:58:03PM -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from
--- Comment #7 from herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au 2006-01-10
22:44 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Redundant reloading from stack frame
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:32:58PM -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from steven
--- Additional Comments From herbert at gondor dot apana dot org dot au
2004-07-17 19:30 ---
I'm sorry but I got this wrong. The compiler is allocating 12 bytes of headroom
unconditionally so it is actually safe.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16601
--- Yo
5 matches
Mail list logo
