Bug#390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument?

Package: gcj-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-15 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 > Build started at 20061002-0105 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>

Bug#233891: [hppa] maxima/acl2 failures at -O1/-O2, -O0 ok

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:58:23PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > it seems that acl2 now builds on hppa. Can we close this bug? yes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254272: gcc-snapshot_20040613-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20040613-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20040613-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 > Build started at 20040613-2312 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Bui

Bug#248631: gcc-snapshot_20040502-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20040502-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20040502-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5 > Build started at 20040512-1403 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-D

Bug#226670: gcc-3.3: implicitly declared function returns a pointer that is used

-bit architecture. Function `stpcpy' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../src/gcc/treelang/parse.c:2085 If appropriate, please upgrade this bug to serious. thanks, lamont

Bug#178602: gcc-3.2_1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends

have libc6.1-dev. Those need to have architectures added to them in order for the autobuild to work. (That or remove the dependency altogether. Given the versioned b-d, that's probably not an option.) lamont > Automatic build of gcc-3.2_1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.169 > Bu

Bug#151886: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa

be simply > incorporated. willy would be a good target. I'm going to be out of town for a couple of weeks, but (if it's still pending) I'd be happy to help when I get back. lamont

Bug#160029: gcc-snapshot_20020907-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: g++ errors

Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20020907-1 Severity: important There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20020907-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.169 > Build started at 20020907-1830 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-D

-2.93745e-306 != 0

Bug #158290 talks about an issue with gcc 3.0 on hppa. Specifically, building perl 5.8 with -O2 fails tests, while -O1 works. Any thoughts on the subject? mawk also suffers from the same ailment. thanks, lamont

Bug#137959: Bug #137959

what the last version was that worked. > It would also be interesting to know whether gcc-snapshot is able to > compile the code successfully. I'll work on these later tonight when I get home. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#137959: g77 errors in blas

severity serious -- marking serious since this bug is keeping several packages out of woody. lamont

Bug#105102: Build failure on ia64 (at least)

Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.ds9-4 Priority: serious Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody. As the Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect. The following build failure