--- Comment #9 from lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 13:55
---
Won't work on it for a long while.
--
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14
14:46 ---
Fixed in the mainline. Won't fix in 4.0 branch since the GCC 3.4.x
behavior is also wrong. The error message present in 4.0 is useful
to point out that the code need to be updated because GCC 4.1
--
Bug 19403 depends on bug 1016, which changed state.
Bug 1016 Summary: [DR 166] friend class declarations not observing namespace
rules.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1016
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13
14:21 ---
The fix is the same as PR1016. GCC 3.4 and earlier compiles but
doesn't have correct behavior. So this should not be treated as
regression.
--
What|Removed |
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16
14:55 ---
This should be ice-on-invalid-code. The code:
bar()();
must be replaced with:
bar<&Dummy::evil>()();
because 'evil' alone is not a valid pointer-to-member function.
GCC co
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15
15:30 ---
Looking at it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28
10:46 ---
Work postponed to GCC 4.1. This bug is tricky to fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4882
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-24
14:36 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-24
14:36 ---
Fixed in the mainline and 3.4 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16706
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-16
15:49 ---
No, it's still waiting for approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16706
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-03
15:25 ---
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg00151.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-01
15:08 ---
Look like something I broke. I think a call to dependent_type_p
is missing somewhere.
--
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12406
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-07
15:14 ---
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg00693.html
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
18 matches
Mail list logo
