--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-26 10:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Maybe related to PR32891.
>
sip-qt problems == PR30052
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32900
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug,
--- Comment #38 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-11 14:11 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> > the patch doesn't fix the sipQtCorepart0.ii time hog, only mem hog is fixed.
> > g++ needs about 300MB of ram and +inf? (canceled after 6 days) of time.
ops little eye damage
--- Comment #36 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-11 14:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=13677)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13677&action=view)
testcase for time-hog.
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #35 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-11 13:17 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Can you check where the time is spent on?
naturally, i'm building gcc with debuginfo now...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30052
--- You are receiving t
--- Comment #33 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-11 13:04 ---
i'm reopening this bug becasue the fix is not complete.
it does fix the xf86ScanPci.i testcase (time/mem hog) and this is great
$ time gcc xf86ScanPci.i -O1 -c ( 2.2GHz amd64, 1GB ram ).
gcc xf86ScanPci.i -O1 -c
--- Comment #31 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-03 07:21 ---
r125227 | dberlin | 2007-05-31 11:37:38 -0400 (Thu, 31 May 2007) | 11 lines
2007-05-27 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix PR/30052
Backport PTA solver from mainline
* pointer-set.c: Cop
--- Comment #105 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-05-28 05:01 ---
(In reply to comment #104)
> kdelibs doesn't link with gcc-4.2.0 with hidden visibility.
you need a path for pr20218.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Comment #21 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-03-20 18:52 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01343.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
--- Comment #19 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-03-16 15:39 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> The patch needs testcases,
i have a testcase but my tcl/autogen/dejagnu crashes
with magic `spawn failed' message :/
e.g.:
(...)
Executing on host:
/home/users/pluto/rpm/BUILD
--- Comment #17 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-03-16 15:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=13214)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13214&action=view)
extended patch against gcc-4.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
--- You are receivi
--- Comment #16 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-22 02:02 ---
quite better ( modulo coding style ) patch is:
--- class.c.orig2006-10-12 22:02:53.0 +0200
+++ class.c 2007-02-22 02:54:11.888652367 +0100
@@ -5105,15 +5105,15 @@
tree dtor;
dtor
--- Comment #14 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-22 00:13 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Already posted as <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00885.html>,
> with no response.
this patch doesn't cover one situation:
struct D;
struct C {
vir
--- Comment #90 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-03-13 20:17 ---
with 4.1.1 snapshot + patches I get an arts crash today on my x86_64 box.
Starting program: /usr/bin/artsd
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2af641d8 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc >::alloc
--- Comment #87 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-12-06 17:05 ---
current 4.1(+libstdc++ patch) works fine for PR21382 on amd64 and ppc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
--- Comment #44 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-26 12:40 ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> i'll check this witout Uros' switch-mmx-mode patchset.
confirmed. Uros' patchset from PR19161 causes this ICE with -mmmx.
Uros, can you look at this?
--
pluto at ag
--- Comment #43 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-26 11:57 ---
i've done quick tests on ix86:
$ stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -c -gnatpg -gnata -g -I- -I. -Iada
-I../../gcc/ada ../../gcc/ada/a-except.adb -o ada/a-except.o -fno-inline -O1
-march=i{486,586,686,pentium,pentiumpro}
WORKS.
--- Comment #42 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-25 16:04 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> it also builds on i486. unfortunately amd64 fails on a-except even with -O0.
>
> (...)
> stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/x86_64-pld-linux/bin/ -c -march=x86-64 -O2 -ggdb
>
>
--- Comment #40 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-24 20:21 ---
it also builds on i486. unfortunately amd64 fails on a-except even with -O0.
(...)
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/x86_64-pld-linux/bin/ -c -march=x86-64 -O2 -ggdb
-gnatpg -gnata -g -O0 \
-I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/ada
--- Comment #39 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-24 14:46 ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> > That doesn't cover the Ada tools. They build for me at -O0 on PowerPC so
> > with
> > Andrew's FE patch + a possible tweak in the Makefile, you should have an Ada
--- Comment #35 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-23 19:47 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Did you try to compile make.adb at -O1 or -O0?
i always do a full bootstrap with different flags for stage1 and 2+.
make bootstrap \
BOOT_CFLAGS="%{rpmcflags}" \
--- Comment #33 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-23 19:16 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> > with patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01666.html
>
> Probably not the correct long-term fix. Might be good enough for 4.1 though.
this fix doesn't hel
--- Comment #31 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-22 00:59 ---
w/o patch still ICEs:
# ppc:
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/ppc-pld-linux/bin/ -c -O2 -ggdb -gnatpg -gnata
-g -O1 -fno-inline \
-I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/ada ../../gcc/ada/a-except.adb -o ada/a-except.o
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|pluto at agmk dot net |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23732
--- You are
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-15 11:16 ---
what about soext in gcc41/gcc/ada/Makefile.in?
there is still soext = .so
is ada abi compatible in gcc 3.3 ... 4.1 ?
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23453
--- You are receiving this mail
26 matches
Mail list logo
