* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-18 10:49]:
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/../lib64/libipq.a(libipq.o): relocation
> > R_X86_64_32 against
> > `a local symbol' cannot be used when making a shared object;
> > recompile with -fPIC
>
> This could be still a binutils issue (without seeing
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/18/2006 10:37:54 AM:
> OK, good news. Most failures are gone with 4.2.0 20060415.
>
> There are still two failures:
>
> perlipq_1.25-1
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/../lib64/libipq.a(libipq.o): relocation
> R_X86_64_32 against
> `a local symbol' canno
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-17 15:26]:
> Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an
> couple of bugs filed about some hidden vs anonymous namespaces
> issues that was worked around in the new version of the compiler.
OK, good news. Most failures are gone with 4.2.0 200
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-17 15:26]:
> Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an
> couple of bugs filed about some hidden vs anonymous namespaces
> issues that was worked around in the new version of the compiler.
20060408 didn't work but it seems 20060415 works, at
Hello,
* Matthias Klose [Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:51:35AM +0200]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an couple
> > of bugs filed about some
> > hidden vs anonymous namespaces issues that was worked around in the new
> > version of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an couple
> of bugs filed about some
> hidden vs anonymous namespaces issues that was worked around in the new
> version of the compiler.
once http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362837 is f
Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an couple
of bugs filed about some
hidden vs anonymous namespaces issues that was worked around in the new
version of the compiler.
-- Pinski
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 21:48]:
> versions as generated by:
> g++ -I. -I. -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O3 -finline-limit=3000 -ffast-math
> -fno-strict-aliasing -DGECODE_BUILD_INT -c -o int/cumulatives.o
> int/cumulatives.cc
FWIW, it builds fine on i386. Maybe an amd64 specific g
reassign 361445 gcc-snapshot
reassign 361426 gcc-snapshot
thanks
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-08 21:48]:
> If I remove the "-finline-limit=3000" from the command line, the
> symbol table stays the same, but all the relocations for it are
> removed for both 4.1 and gcc snapshot.
In t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 361445 gcc-snapshot
Bug#361445: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: recompile with -fPIC
Bug reassigned from package `gecode' to `gcc-snapshot'.
> reassign 361426 gcc-snapshot
Bug#361426: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: recompile with -fPIC
Bug reassig
10 matches
Mail list logo
