[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2007-07-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 02:35 --- *** Bug 32888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-07-31 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 22:52 --- Subject: Bug 6634 Author: reichelt Date: Mon Jul 31 22:52:20 2006 New Revision: 115843 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115843 Log: PR c++/6634 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Che

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-07-31 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-31 22:35 --- Subject: Bug number PR c++/6634 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01267.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-15 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 15:29 --- Fixed on mainline. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-15 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 15:27 --- Subject: Bug 6634 Author: reichelt Date: Wed Mar 15 15:27:11 2006 New Revision: 112084 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112084 Log: PR c++/6634 decl.c (grokdeclarator): Do not

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-06 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-03-06 17:45 --- Subject: Bug number PR c++/6634 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00334.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-05 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 17:43 --- Mine. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassig

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-07 04:47:52 |2006-03-05 03:36:17 date||

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2005-12-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-09-04 18:20:30 |2005-12-07 04:47:52 date||

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2004-11-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6634 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2004-11-30 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-30 11:24 --- No this isn't fixed. It works with the C frontend since 2.95.x, but not with the C++ frontend. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2004-11-30 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-30 11:24 --- Subject: Re: wrong parsing of "long long double" On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote: > Mainline is fixed. > pr6634.i:1: error: both 'long long' and 'double' in declaration specifi

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2004-11-30 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-30 10:00 --- Mainline is fixed. pr6634.i:1: error: both 'long long' and 'double' in declaration specifiers So is 3.4.4 and 3.3.2 pr6634.i:1: error: long or short specified with floating type for `a' pr6634.i:1: error: