https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-30 13:36 ---
*** Bug 24454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are wat
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-30 13:32:35 |2006-01-26 05:26:55
date||
--
dpollock at acm dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpollock at acm dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||24454
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.o
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
Summary|Numerical result differs
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
--- Additional Comments From pmoulder at mail dot csse dot monash dot edu
dot au 2004-05-12 09:19 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Java only requires exact FP results for
> strictfp classes and methods.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/expressions.doc.html#249198
say
--- Additional Comments From pmoulder at mail dot csse dot monash dot edu
dot au 2004-05-12 08:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=6263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6263&action=view)
short test case showing difference from sun jdk
The attached short program suggests
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-06
16:22 ---
Java only requires exact FP results for
strictfp classes and methods. So you would
have to
10 matches
Mail list logo
