[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Comment #23 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 23:25 --- Fixed for gcc-4.1. Won't fix for gcc-4.0.3. -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Comment #22 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 23:24 --- Subject: Bug 17356 Author: wilson Date: Mon Oct 31 23:24:36 2005 New Revision: 106297 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106297 Log: Rewrite fix for PR 17356, fix for enable checking ada build fa

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Comment #21 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 23:10 --- I done bootstrap tests for the gcc-4.0.x branch. I bootstrapped all default languages plus ada with and without the patch. There were no regressions. There was also no failure as reported in the PR, which seemed f

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 00:56 --- (In reply to comment #19) > Fixed on mainline, still broken on gcc-4.0.x branch. I've started a builds to > test it. This will take a while. Removing the 4.1 regression marker than since it will be a while. --

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 18:47 --- Removing the target milestone as per as this is only known to happen in Ada. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-12-06 22:24 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hmm, looks like something changed recently: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00248.html > Or those results compiled at -O0? Yes the 4.0 run was done at -O0 per my req

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 21:58 --- Ignore the first link, that was for 3.4.4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17356 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching s

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06 21:57 --- Hmm, looks like something changed recently: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00280.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00248.html Or those results compiled at -O0? -- ht

[Bug rtl-optimization/17356] [4.0 Regression] [Ada] [ia64] ACATS c41325a & other ICE, also while building libada

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-12-05 21:02 --- The simplest ACATS test I could find that exhibits this ICE is c41325a. Here is the standalone code with no ties to ACATS support. Removing anything makes the ICE go away according to Andreas Schwab. $ cat rep.a