--- Comment #38 from joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-12-19 13:34
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] Wrong code with REG_NO_CONFLICT notes (caused by
combine)
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Comment #37 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 12:36
>---
--- Comment #37 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 12:36 ---
That would be a different bug, and the fix would still be to not have a
no-conflict block to begin with.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #36 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 12:01
---
While the patch will stop the bug from being triggered by the test case,
it does not fix th underlying combiner bug.
Any REG_NO_CONFLICT block could potentially be rendered invalid by an
inappropriate instruction
--- Comment #35 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 17:32
---
Subject: Bug 23837
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 17 17:32:36 2005
New Revision: 108721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108721
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/23837
* optabs.c (expan
--- Comment #34 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 17:31
---
Fixed overall.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #33 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 17:30
---
Fixed also in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
6 matches
Mail list logo
