--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
--- You a
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
--- You a
--- Comment #5 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:13 ---
Sorry, wrong bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:12 ---
The removed comment says:
- /* If will do cse, generate all results into pseudo registers
- since 1) that allows cse to find more things
- and 2) otherwise cse could produce an insn the machine
- cannot support.
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 11:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
That would almost mean as is being miscompiled on m68k.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-27 22:21 ---
What I said about binutils might be wrong. It seems it's not due to a
difference in the version, but due to one being native and one being cross. I
just upgraded the binutils-m68k on i386 to the same version as that on m68k
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-27 22:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=11766)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11766&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian
8 matches
Mail list logo
