RE: -pedantic reports ambiguous base

2002-01-10 Thread Martin Dorey
Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-gcc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: -pedantic reports ambiguous base > Without -pedantic there is not even a warning (even with -W -Wall). > 10.2.1 says "for a qualified-id, name lookup begins in the scop

Re: -pedantic reports ambiguous base

2002-01-09 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> Without -pedantic there is not even a warning (even with -W -Wall). > 10.2.1 says "for a qualified-id, name lookup begins in the scope of > 10.2.the nested-name-specifier". In which scope, I don't think the > 10.2.reference to pop() or HWQueue, for that matter, is ambiguous. This is caused by

-pedantic reports ambiguous base

2002-01-09 Thread Martin Dorey
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator: >Organization: BlueArc >Confidential: no >Synopsis: -pedantic reports ambiguous base >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: c++ >Class: rejects-legal >Release: 3.0.3 (Debian testing/