On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:14:48AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> So it's:
>
> #if defined(__linux__) && defined(__GLIBC__) && !defined(__FAVOR_BSD)
>
> /* defines go in here */
>
> #endif
>
> Is that right? What happens on a non-Linux system running glibc? (Or
> is this not
If memory serves me right, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:40:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I believe Linux is the OS that pchar woks on that uses different names for
> > the members of struct udphdr. Until now, _BSD_SOURCE has provided a way to
> > have things "just
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:40:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> (Bruce: see http://bugs.debian.org/108663 for background)
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:18:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > -D_GNU_SOURCE is absolutely necessary to use libstdc++ v3.0. Thus, G++
> > 3.0 automatically de
(Bruce: see http://bugs.debian.org/108663 for background)
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:18:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> -D_GNU_SOURCE is absolutely necessary to use libstdc++ v3.0. Thus, G++
> 3.0 automatically defines it.
>
> You're not going to be able to do anything about that :) I r
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:20:05PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > If I do
> >
> > g++ -E -c -D_BSD_SOURCE /usr/include/netinet/udp.h
> >
> > then I can see the BSD definitions (uh_sport etc), both on i386 and hppa.
> > But if I do
> >
> > g++-3.0 -E -c udphdrtest.c
> >
> > then I see the non-
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 10:59:12PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> This is a pretty funky bug. I've been experimenting with it, as I have
> an hppa machine of my own. I have all the latest sid updates installed.
>
> The difference seems to be g++ 3.0 on hppa. You can replicate it on
> i386 (etc) w
6 matches
Mail list logo
