Phil Edwards writes:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Perhaps gcc-3.0's postinst can do something like "if package 'gcc' is
> > > installed, then update the symlink"? I'm guessing out my butt here.
> >
> > we removed the gcc alternatives a year ago, which ac
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Phil Edwards writes:
> > The 'gcc' package is hardcoded to gcc-2.95 right now. You can have all
> > three packages installed, and the symlink doesn't change:
Just to clarify: I wasn't complaining when I wrote that, merely making
i
James Troup writes:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.2-3
>
> All the -3.0 packages don't depend, recommend or even suggest the
> packages making it possible (especially on hppa where -3.0 is
> the default compiler) to install just gcc-3.0 and not have a gcc
> symlink which is probably not a go
Phil Edwards writes:
>
> > All the -3.0 packages don't depend, recommend or even suggest the
> > packages making it possible (especially on hppa where -3.0 is
> > the default compiler) to install just gcc-3.0 and not have a gcc
> > symlink which is probably not a good thing?
>
> The 'gcc' packag
> All the -3.0 packages don't depend, recommend or even suggest the
> packages making it possible (especially on hppa where -3.0 is
> the default compiler) to install just gcc-3.0 and not have a gcc
> symlink which is probably not a good thing?
The 'gcc' package is hardcoded to gcc-2.95 right no
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.2-3
All the -3.0 packages don't depend, recommend or even suggest the
packages making it possible (especially on hppa where -3.0 is
the default compiler) to install just gcc-3.0 and not have a gcc
symlink which is probably not a good thing?
--
James
6 matches
Mail list logo
