Re: Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread David Starner
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 11:03:59PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > > Will someone please take responsibility for this [EMAIL PROTECTED]@# bug! > > > We take patches, you know? Fine; line 5 of gij-3.0.postinst should end in || true. > Just like /bin/rm could easily be used to delete the kernel. Tha

Re: Bug#139796: Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread Paul Seelig
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:04:09PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:27:30PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > > If you as a system administrator delete files belonging to a package, be it > > through rm, localepurge or vi /dev/hda, you have no right to expect the > > packa

Re: Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread Paul Seelig
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:57:24PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:48:10AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > This is a case of "don't do that then" which has been discussed at length > > before: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=139796&repeatme

Re: Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread David Starner
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:27:30PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > > These users are using localepurge in the exact way the instructions say > > to. > > And now they're sufficiently warned IMHO. So you can fix a critical bug by adding a warning to the package? Why did we add a Conflicts: tag,

Re: Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 13:57:24 -0500, David Starner wrote: > Will someone please take responsibility for this [EMAIL PROTECTED]@# bug! The localepurge maintainer has taken responsibility for this problem by extending it's description with the following note: : Please note, that this tool is a ha

Re: Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread David Starner
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:48:10AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is a case of "don't do that then" which has been discussed at length > before: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=139796&repeatmerged=yes > > I'm closing this bug report. Will someone please take re

Bug#144605: marked as done (gij-3.0: Does not install)

2002-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:47:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#144605: gij-3.0: Does not install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y