On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 01:33:34AM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 01:21:48AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis scribbled:
> > Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > OK, I found the statement about the preceeding non-witespace tokens but,
> > > still, I would think tha
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 01:21:48AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis scribbled:
> Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK, I found the statement about the preceeding non-witespace tokens but,
> > still, I would think that something that breaks the kernel compile should be
> > important no matte
Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, I found the statement about the preceeding non-witespace tokens but,
> still, I would think that something that breaks the kernel compile should be
> important no matter how trivial to work-around it is...
The question is whether it should be fixe
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:35:07AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis scribbled:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > printf(KERN_ERR "[" DRM_NAME ":%s] *ERROR* " fmt , __FUNCTION__, ##
> > args)
> [...]
> > which is invalid C syntax. ##' gets rid of the comma, so we get the
> > following instead:
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> printf(KERN_ERR "[" DRM_NAME ":%s] *ERROR* " fmt , __FUNCTION__, ##
> args)
[...]
> which is invalid C syntax. ##' gets rid of the comma, so we get the
> following instead:
>
> fprintf (stderr, "success!\n")
>
>
> Which is not the case. That bug breaks
Package: cpp-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-10
Severity: important
Given the sample code (extracted from the Linux kernel sources):
#include
#define DRM_NAME "drm"
#define KERN_ERR "<7>"
#define DRM_ERROR(fmt, args...) \
printf(KERN_ERR "[" DRM_NAME ":%s] *ERROR* " fmt , __FUNCTION__, ##
args)
6 matches
Mail list logo
