Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Duplicates of 184117 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2003 22:37:37 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 09 16:37:37 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18s9QG-0004C3-00; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:37:36 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16314 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 23:36:59 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h29Maxv04072; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 23:36:59 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 23:36:59 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: broken libc-dev dependencies in 1:3.2.3-0pre4 upload X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre4 Severity: serious A new upload is in the works. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 184119-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 01:58:16 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 19:58:15 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tomts5.bellnexxia.net (tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) [209.226.175.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18svVX-0001kS-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:58:15 -0600 Received: from crystal ([64.229.1.47]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:58:14 -0500 Received: from hsteoh by crystal with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18svXl-0005nT-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Duplicates of 184117 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: The broken dependency problem has already been fixed in gcj-3.2 1:3.2.3ds4-0pre5 and gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre5, AFAICT. Please reopen if it's not. T -- I am not young enough to know everything. -- Oscar Wilde