Randolph Chung writes:
> > #186447 is a segfault in the compiler, you get a segfault in the
> > assembler (program as). Please recheck using gcc-3.3 and report the
> > results.
>
> retrying with latest binutils seem to work. Lamont has rescheduled the
> dozen-or-so packages that had segfaults on t
> #186447 is a segfault in the compiler, you get a segfault in the
> assembler (program as). Please recheck using gcc-3.3 and report the
> results.
retrying with latest binutils seem to work. Lamont has rescheduled the
dozen-or-so packages that had segfaults on the assembler so that they
will get
Drew Parsons writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre8
> Severity: important
>
> xprint-xprintorg fails to build on HPPA (see
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xprint-xprintorg&ver=0.0.8.cvs20030403-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1050208551&file=log&as=raw
> )
>
> The reason is that gcc segf
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre8
Severity: important
xprint-xprintorg fails to build on HPPA (see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xprint-xprintorg&ver=0.0.8.cvs20030403-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1050208551&file=log&as=raw
)
The reason is that gcc segfaults:
make[3]: Entering directory
/b
4 matches
Mail list logo
