> I'd think there should be a strstream.h, and not strstream, but see what
> PR 7230 says.
How odd. I would have expected strstream.h too.
*shrug* Somebody has to lose, and frankly, when it's a deprecated header
that was never standardized in the first place, I don't much care who it is.
After
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 02:30:08PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 03:31:50PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:36:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev
> > > Version: 1:3.3-2
> > > Severity: minor
> > >
> > > As the subject
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 03:31:50PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:36:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev
> > Version: 1:3.3-2
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > As the subject says, g++-3.3 no longer supports the
> > header for backwards compatibil
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:36:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev
> Version: 1:3.3-2
> Severity: minor
>
> As the subject says, g++-3.3 no longer supports the
> header for backwards compatibility, while g++-3.2 did. At least one
> source package, dx, needs this heade
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: minor
As the subject says, g++-3.3 no longer supports the
header for backwards compatibility, while g++-3.2 did. At least one
source package, dx, needs this header.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
5 matches
Mail list logo
