Processed: Re: Bug#194242 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token))

2003-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 194242 Bug#194242: gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel Bug#194196: Can't compile kernel 2.4.20 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 194242 kernel Bug#194242: gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the ke

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token))

2003-06-01 Thread Brian M. Carlson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: > drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a > valid preprocessing token) > In-Reply-To

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-29 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Brian M. Carlson wrote: The standard says this is undefined behaviour. The code never "worked", but by pure accident produced the expected result. The compiler is *permitted* to make demons fly out of my nose, but if it did that, I'd file a bug on it asserting that it shouldn't do that either. Say

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-26 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Brian M. Carlson wrote: > >This would have (or at least should > >have) been caught, because gcc 3.3 introduced a complete incompatibility > >with older versions: creating an error when pasting together two such > >tokens. I don'

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-26 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Brian M. Carlson wrote: This would have (or at least should have) been caught, because gcc 3.3 introduced a complete incompatibility with older versions: creating an error when pasting together two such tokens. I don't know what the standard says on this issue, but at most it requires a diagnostic,

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-25 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:35:23PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at > > least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site states: > > Which kernel version? On which architecture? Wi

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-25 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at > least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site states: Which kernel version? On which architecture? With which drivers? Its fair to say Gcc shouldn't have any bugs that show up in a few

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-25 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:11:43PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:03AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > reopen 194242 > > reassign 194242 gcc > > retitle 194242 gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel > > merge 194242 194196 > > thanks, control > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#194242 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 194242 Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 194242 gcc Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "st

Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting "." and "start" does not give a valid preprocessing token)

2003-05-24 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:03AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > reopen 194242 > reassign 194242 gcc > retitle 194242 gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel > merge 194242 194196 > thanks, control > > Then gcc 3.3 should not be the default gcc yet. Reassigning to > gcc. I di