On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:20:07AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:39:08 +0200,
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:18:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:24:36 +0200,
> > > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > The bug submitter clai
At Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:39:08 +0200,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:18:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:24:36 +0200,
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > The bug submitter claims that a missing /proc leads to ICE's in gcc
> > > and thinks this might b
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:18:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:24:36 +0200,
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The bug submitter claims that a missing /proc leads to ICE's in gcc
> > and thinks this might be a bug in glibc or gcc. Any ideas? I'm unable
> > to reproduce this one.
>
At Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:24:36 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> The bug submitter claims that a missing /proc leads to ICE's in gcc
> and thinks this might be a bug in glibc or gcc. Any ideas? I'm unable
> to reproduce this one.
strace give us some more hints.
BTW, why did Jeroen use 2.6.3? AFAIK som
The bug submitter claims that a missing /proc leads to ICE's in gcc
and thinks this might be a bug in glibc or gcc. Any ideas? I'm unable
to reproduce this one.
Matthias
5 matches
Mail list logo