Bug#361024: about glibc bug(?)

2006-04-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Sheplyakov Alexei wrote: On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:14:19PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The only problem in bug #226716 is that the glibc should refuse to execute such programs instead of silently failing. But in the case of the current bug, this is actually the case, it says "cannot handle T

Bug#361024: about glibc bug(?)

2006-04-08 Thread Sheplyakov Alexei
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:14:19PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The only problem in bug #226716 is that the glibc should refuse to > execute such programs instead of silently failing. > But in the case of the current bug, this is actually the case, it says > "cannot handle TLS data". The prob

Bug#361024: about glibc bug(?)

2006-04-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Sheplyakov Alexei wrote: On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 19:17:03 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: glibc does support TLS on all kernels (even non-linux ones), if there is the corresponding kernel support. So please don't claim this is a glibc bug. The test program included in #226716 fails under 2.4 kernel

Bug#361024: about glibc bug(?)

2006-04-08 Thread Sheplyakov Alexei
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 19:17:03 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > glibc does support TLS on all kernels (even non-linux ones), if there is > the corresponding kernel support. So please don't claim this is a glibc bug. The test program included in #226716 fails under 2.4 kernel and works as expected und