On 12/07/07 22:04, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Martin Orr wrote:
>> binutils (>= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.17.20070406cvs-2
>
> I don't know if it makes difference but you should try to upgrade
> binutils away from that version from experimental.
Nothing to do with this bug, but thanks for pointi
Martin Orr writes:
> Package: gcc-4.2
> Version: 4.2-20070707-1
> Severity: important
>
> When I build the kernel (either 2.6.21 or 2.6.22) with gcc 4.2-20070707-1,
> then try to boot, I get a hang in udevsettle. If I build with gcc
> 4.2-20070627-1, everything is fine.
please recheck with 4.2-2
Martin Orr wrote:
> binutils (>= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.17.20070406cvs-2
I don't know if it makes difference but you should try to upgrade
binutils away from that version from experimental.
Apt and other utils think that experimental has bigger version number
than more recent in unstable.
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070707-1
Severity: important
When I build the kernel (either 2.6.21 or 2.6.22) with gcc 4.2-20070707-1,
then try to boot, I get a hang in udevsettle. If I build with gcc
4.2-20070627-1, everything is fine.
The file which matters is arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c. Th
4 matches
Mail list logo
