--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I just need to allocate a weekend to rebuild the gdc package, and send
> it to be uploaded.
Fair enough. I'll wait for that, I think; my attempted compile blew up after a
couple of hours in the middle of what appears to be linking of some D bits.
Andr
On 16 January 2013 22:10, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> --- On Wed, 1/16/13, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> > The module core.simd - and __vector's for that matter - did not appear
> > until a later release.
>
> Hi Iain,
>
> Thanks for the info. I'm compiling the gdc-4.7 branch now. Any chance
> it'll appe
--- On Wed, 1/16/13, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> The module core.simd - and __vector's for that matter - did not appear
> until a later release.
Hi Iain,
Thanks for the info. I'm compiling the gdc-4.7 branch now. Any chance it'll
appear in Debian at a later date, since gcc is already at 4.7, or are
On 16 January 2013 21:46, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> Package: gdc
> Version: 4.6.3-8
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The gdc compiler works in general, but appears to be missing the core.simd
> libraries.
>
>
Hi Andrew,
The module core.simd - and __vector's for that matter - did not
Package: gdc
Version: 4.6.3-8
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The gdc compiler works in general, but appears to be missing the core.simd
libraries.
Sample code:
import core.simd;
int main(string [] args) {
return 0;
}
Compilation output:
$ gdc testsimd.d -o testsimd
testsimd.d:1: E
5 matches
Mail list logo