On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 02.10.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paum
Am 02.10.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please n
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
> > > While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
> > > this bug means that all the packag
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 07:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
> > While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
> > this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
> > packages in jessie) are currently in
On 17:38, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Axel (in CC) can probably set up an account on asdfasdf. I fear Steven's
> vm has already expired which would have been a powerfull option as well
Yep, my VM is gone now. Hopefully the Debian porterbox will be up to
the task, but if not we can look into ways to
On 27 September 2014 16:38, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Iain Buclaw writes:
>> If I can get to a port box with kfreebsd, I can investigate what is
>> going on further.
>
> Axel (in CC) can probably set up an account on asdfasdf. I fear Steven's
> vm has already expired which would have been
Hi!
Iain Buclaw writes:
> If I can get to a port box with kfreebsd, I can investigate what is
> going on further.
Axel (in CC) can probably set up an account on asdfasdf. I fear Steven's
vm has already expired which would have been a powerfull option as well
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A
On 14/09/14 19:30, Petr Salinger wrote:
>> No 'undefined reference' errors in the build log. Both regular and -m32
>> multilib versions of the static library are there:
>
> I have problem with lgdruntime_t:
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> Makefile:639: recipe for target 'unittest'
Hi,
On 13/09/14 19:01, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Please try to grep "undefined reference" from your build log.
> These errors do not lead to FTBFS, but they indicate some problem.
I've tried again building gcc-4.9 4.9.1-14 on a clean, sid
kfreebsd-amd64 system. I only removed gnu-kfreebsd from
$lib
On 13 Sep 2014 18:51, "Steven Chamberlain" wrote:
>
> On 12/09/14 21:44, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > It seems that simple drop of kfreebsd-gnu from libphobos_no_systems does
> > not suffice.
> > In the build logs are messages like
> >
> >
/build/manual/gcc-4.9-4.9.1/build/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/libphobo
On 12/09/14 21:44, Petr Salinger wrote:
> It seems that simple drop of kfreebsd-gnu from libphobos_no_systems does
> not suffice.
> In the build logs are messages like
>
> /build/manual/gcc-4.9-4.9.1/build/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/libphobos/libdruntime/../../../../src/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/dmain2.d:
Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
sure, and they still will ftbfs without libph
Le 12/09/2014 19:34, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
>> While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
>> this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
>> packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kf
Am 12.09.2014 um 15:13 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
> While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
> this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
> packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
sure, and they still will ftbfs without li
Le 12/09/2014 14:23, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Control: severity -1 important
Dear Matthias,
While it's your prerogative to decrease the severity, please note that
this bug means that all the packages that build-depend on gdc (22
packages in jessie) are currently in an FTBFS-state on kfreebsd.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #761277 [gdc] gdc uninstallable on kfreebsd because of missing dep.
libphobos-4.9-dev
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
761277: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761277
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
Control: severity -1 important
Am 12.09.2014 um 12:47 schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
> Package: gdc
> Version: 4.9.1-4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> gdc currently depends on libphobos-4.9-dev, including on kfreebsd-*, but
> libphobos-4.9-dev is not beeing built on these architectures.
>
> It may be t
Package: gdc
Version: 4.9.1-4
Severity: grave
Hi,
gdc currently depends on libphobos-4.9-dev, including on kfreebsd-*, but
libphobos-4.9-dev is not beeing built on these architectures.
It may be that the bug is that libphobos should be built on kfreebsd.
From the gcc-4.9 build log:
-Dlibphobos_
18 matches
Mail list logo
