On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In particular, the size of "lto1" went from 20 MB to 144 MB.
> Is this really normal/expected?
Hmm, lto1 was stripped in GCC 5 (stretch) and now it's unstripped again
(sid, GCC 6). Is this intended or accidental?
Thanks.
Hello Matthias.
With GCC 6 as the default, the size of a minimal build system has grown
by about 150 MB.
In particular, the size of "lto1" went from 20 MB to 144 MB.
Is this really normal/expected?
While we are at it, this bug is marked as "forwarded". Are there any
news from the upstream mainta
On 04/22/2016 12:11 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is abo
On 04/22/2016 12:11 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is abou
On 22.04.2016 00:55, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:22:33AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 22.04.2016 00:11, Santiago Vila wrote:
The problem with that is that it breaks the expectation that testing
is in an "always releaseable" state.
Sure, the file /etc/debian_version break
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:22:33AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 22.04.2016 00:11, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >The problem with that is that it breaks the expectation that testing
> >is in an "always releaseable" state.
> >
> >Sure, the file /etc/debian_version breaks such expectation too, but of
>
On 22.04.2016 00:11, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 1
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> > Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
> > lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
> >
> > Please, can those
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR67165
Bug #783876 [gcc-5] gcc-5: consider stripping lto1 / cc1 / cc1plus
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/PR67165'.
--
783876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR67165
On 08/03/2015 10:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-08-03 09:57, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>> I would believe that is not easily possible. I don't know the detailed
>> behavior of libbacktrace, but it is using & parsing the DWARF debug
>> inf
On 2015-08-03 09:57, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:47:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2015-04-30 23:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> > > > Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> > > > /usr
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:47:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-04-30 23:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> > > Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one
On 2015-04-30 23:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> > Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
> > lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
> >
> > Please, can those
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 09:22:25 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> How can a plugin call existing GCC functions, e.g. walk_gimple_seq
> declared in
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/plugin/include/gimple-walk.h and
> implemented inside cc1 ?
I've not checked how plugins are implemented in gc
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07/04/2015 04:23 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 23:10:15 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> >>> Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> >>
On 07/04/2015 04:23 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 23:10:15 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
>>> Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
>>> lt
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 23:10:15 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> > Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
> > lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
> >
> > Ple
On 06/28/2015 05:52 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 17:43:00 -0300, Daniel Serpell wrote:
Package: gcc-5
Version: 5.1.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1
Hi!
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 17:43:00 -0300, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> Package: gcc-5
> Version: 5.1.1-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
> lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
>
On 04/30/2015 10:43 PM, Daniel Serpell wrote:
> Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
> lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
>
> Please, can those files be striped in the default installation?
I'd like
Package: gcc-5
Version: 5.1.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
Please, can those files be striped in the default installat
21 matches
Mail list logo
