On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:55:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> P.S. Here is a script I wrote to get the libc6 and libc6-dev packages
> for dpkg-cross - there must be an easier way?
OK, i've now make a new release that includes this script of yours as well
as a desccription on how to
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:55:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > - Change crossbase in /etc/dpkg/cross-compile from /usr/local to /usr.
> > > Why
> > > is this defaulting to /usr/local? Don't we want cross-compil
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:55:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> > - Change crossbase in /etc/dpkg/cross-compile from /usr/local to /usr. Why
> > is this defaulting to /usr/local? Don't we want cross-compilers in /usr?
>
> Well I suppose it depends how you chop your disc up, pers
* Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I have now built a gcc-m68k-linux package by installilng an libc-m68k-cross
> and an libc-dev-m68k-cross created by dpkg-cross before building gcc. What
> I had to do to get it working was:
Cool.
> - Change crossbase in /etc/dpkg/cross-compile from
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:05:53PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> My suggestion is to use dpkg-cross to get appropriate libraries and
> point to the place it installs them, perhaps even make the dpkg-cross
> installed packages included in the build dependencies.
I have now built a gcc-m
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:07:40PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert writes:
>
> > > Erm no; avr to be gcc-avr, alpha-linux to be gcc-alpha-linux ?
> >
> > assuming, that new Debian ports are made for bsd and cygwin, I
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert writes:
> > Erm no; avr to be gcc-avr, alpha-linux to be gcc-alpha-linux ?
>
> assuming, that new Debian ports are made for bsd and cygwin, I would
> prefer including the os name, even for linux.
Erm - I'm confused. The OS n
Dr. David Alan Gilbert writes:
> * Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> That I had written:
>
> > > Personally I'd prefer that the name is passed-as-is to the gcc/binutils
> > > configures; because I normally know what to give those to get what I
> > > want. I'd agree with adding the -linux i
* Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
That I had written:
> > Personally I'd prefer that the name is passed-as-is to the gcc/binutils
> > configures; because I normally know what to give those to get what I
> > want. I'd agree with adding the -linux in if it was for everything,
> > but since t
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:05:53PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > associated stuff; is it appropriate to use dpkg-cross to get these?
> >
> > I don't know what's the best solution here. What is the procedure proposed
> > upstream?
>
> A variety of nasty hacks, half working solutions
* Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:01:45PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > summary
> > ---
> > All binutils seem to build happily
> > Gcc's are a lot more of a problem
>
> Nice going!
No problem.
> > associated stuff; is it appropriate to use d
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:01:45PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> summary
> ---
> All binutils seem to build happily
> Gcc's are a lot more of a problem
Nice going!
>
> OK - so most of these look like they are after bits of libc and
> associated stuff; is it appropriate to use dpk
* Hakan Ardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
> new versions of toolchain-source gcc-avr and binutils-avr have now been
> released fixing some problems:
Hi Hakan,
I've just spent a little time playing about with your toolchain-source
package on my Debian/unstable/Athlon system.
summary
---
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:03:00AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hakan Ardo writes:
>
> > The process is documented in /usr/share/doc/toolchain-source/README,
> > but should probably be placed where people might look for it. Where
> > is that?
>
> Maybe you want to provide an updated README.cros
Hi,
new versions of toolchain-source gcc-avr and binutils-avr have now been
released fixing some problems:
toolchain-source (3.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Template no long an archive in src package
* Created packages now uses tar tjf and Build-Depends on tar >=
1.13.18 (Bug #128533)
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:03:00AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hakan Ardo writes:
>
> > The process is documented in /usr/share/doc/toolchain-source/README,
> > but should probably be placed where people might look for it. Where
> > is that?
>
> Maybe you want to provide an updated README.cros
Hakan Ardo writes:
> The process is documented in /usr/share/doc/toolchain-source/README,
> but should probably be placed where people might look for it. Where
> is that?
Maybe you want to provide an updated README.cross file for
gcc-{2.95,3.0}?
17 matches
Mail list logo
