Re: GCC and binutils updates for buster

2018-07-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 17.07.2018 12:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Matthias! > > On 07/16/2018 05:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I understand that port maintainers want to have their port included as a >> release >> architecture, however it becomes a burden if neither the upstream nor the >> Debian >>

Re: GCC and binutils updates for buster

2018-07-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Matthias! On 07/16/2018 05:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > I understand that port maintainers want to have their port included as a > release > architecture, however it becomes a burden if neither the upstream nor the > Debian > port maintainers can keep up with the general upstream developmen

GCC and binutils updates for buster

2018-07-17 Thread Matthias Klose
GCC 8 is available in testing/unstable, and upstream is approaching the first point release. I am planning to make GCC 8 the default at the end of the week (gdc and gccgo already point to GCC 8). Most runtime libraries built from GCC are already used in the version built from GCC 8, so I don't ex