Re: IA-64: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96

2001-12-07 Thread Randolph Chung
> I want leave the final decision to Randolph Tausq, which does (?) the > ia64 parts in gcc. It's always refreshing to get a new name ;-) Matthias, please update gcc-defaults so that for ia64: g77 stays the way it is (points to 2.96) gobjc points to gobjc points to 3.0 Thanks! randolph -- Debia

Re: IA-64: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96

2001-12-07 Thread John R. Daily
Concern over unforeseen consequences, and the fact that there is now in fact a newer g77-2.96 that works better, means that 2.96 will likely continue to be the default for ia64. Objective C, on the other hand, no longer exists in 2.96 on ia64 at all. -- John R. Daily

Re: IA-64: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96

2001-12-07 Thread Matthias Klose
John R. Daily writes: > I sent this to the debian-ia64 list recently and received no > input. Given the apparent lack of concern about making such a > change, I'd like to inquire on this list whether such a change > would be technically and politically feasible pre-woody. > > Matthias, I understan

IA-64: g77-3.0 vs. -2.96

2001-11-14 Thread John R. Daily
I sent this to the debian-ia64 list recently and received no input. Given the apparent lack of concern about making such a change, I'd like to inquire on this list whether such a change would be technically and politically feasible pre-woody. Matthias, I understand that your input is particularly