On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 19:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Those operations are atomic for any number of CPUs, so you're looking
> in the wrong place.
Ok, I take Your word for it :-), and I will try to look around ones
again to see if I can locate the problem somewhere else. And I will then
try to ex
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:37:30PM +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:32, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Is this your own installation of GCC 3.2? Our
> > i386-linux/bits/atomicity.h contains the atomic operations, not a
> > single-threaded version.
> No, it is not, it
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:32, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Huh? Is this your own installation of GCC 3.2? Our
> i386-linux/bits/atomicity.h contains the atomic operations, not a
> single-threaded version.
No, it is not, it is the standard (testing) debian package. I'm not an
i386 asm expert but t
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 03:55:32PM +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> Hi ...
>
> I have been spending some time, trying to make the g++ 3.2 work in a MT
> environment, and it works out quite nicely, but ... I have some problems
> while using strings (other things too I belive) on a SMP machine.
>
> Now
Hi ...
I have been spending some time, trying to make the g++ 3.2 work in a MT
environment, and it works out quite nicely, but ... I have some problems
while using strings (other things too I belive) on a SMP machine.
Now this all ends up in the "i386-linux/bits/atomicity.h" file, that
"only" con
5 matches
Mail list logo