Hello,
Probably you get questions like this often, but I have been asked to start
trying to do private/local backports of more recent versions of GCC to
Debian 10 for academic purposes. I am aware that I could probably just
download the source from GNU, compile it, and stash it someplace, but
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:00:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920166: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #816366,
regarding g++-5: Illegal access to private field compiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
X::i which is private. Only happens in the
sepcific
combination of a new thread and the lambda expression.
BR,
Gábor Németh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (900, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
For
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1
Severity: minor
Following code compiles:
/
class E { class B {}; };
template
class D : E::B {};
int main()
{
D();
}
/
with:
g++ -x c++ -W -Wall -std=c++98 -pedantic main.cpp
But should it?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers tes
Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:02:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnat: Legal program rejected, completion of private type
declaration
has caused the Debian Bug report #278686,
regarding [Fixed in 4.3] gnat: Legal program rejected, completion of p
Good evening;
It was brought to your attention that we may be able to help you?
We keep our information confidential, so we cannot say who it was, other than
it was a female who you know.
We have included the link below for you to view:
http://www.clucks.net
Your secret is safe with us
Jennie
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:58:15AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> I found one
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg01760.html
>
> and a link from there to,
> http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#209
>
> I don't understand the reasons for using access control in the friend
> s
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I'm not on the list so please cc me any replies.
>>
>>I've noticed that friends cannot be protected or private anymore with
>>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:18:56AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not on the list so please cc me any replies.
>
> I've noticed that friends cannot be protected or private anymore with
> g++-3.4 and g++-4.0. Is this the correct behaviour? Why?
Yes, thi
Hi all,
I'm not on the list so please cc me any replies.
I've noticed that friends cannot be protected or private anymore with
g++-3.4 and g++-4.0. Is this the correct behaviour? Why?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ g++ -c test.cpp
test.cpp:4: error: ‘void test1::f1()’ is protected
test.cp
THIS IS GOING TO BE OUR ABSOLUTE ATTEMPT
We have endevored to speak to you on many periods and we await your response
now!
Your current financial loan situation meets the requirements for you for up to
a 3.10% lower rate.
However, based on the fact that our previous attempts to speak to you di
THIS IS GOING TO BE OUR ABSOLUTE ATTEMPT
We have endevored to speak to you on many periods and we await your response
now!
Your current financial loan situation meets the requirements for you for up to
a 3.10% lower rate.
However, based on the fact that our previous attempts to speak to you di
Hey, this is Lisa! One of my friends said she knew
you and we should get in contact with each other.
I just got my videocamera working so we can talk as long
as you want at my website and it doesn't cost you anything
if you wanna watch/see me!
Just Copy and Paste the URL below in your Broswe
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This is an intended consequence of the new 3.4 C++ parser. From
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
>>
>> "In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find
>> members of a dependent base"
>>
>> You need to refer t
> This is an intended consequence of the new 3.4 C++ parser. From
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
>
> "In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find
> members of a dependent base"
>
> You need to refer to "this->f" rather than the unqualified "f".
Oka
> template
> class A
> {
> protected:
> int f;
> };
>
> template
> class B: public A
> {
> public:
> B()
> {
> f = 1; // line 14
> }
> };
>
> gcc-3.3 has no problem with this, but gcc-3.4 complains as follows:
>
> a.cc: In constructor `B::B()':
> a.cc:14: error: `f
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Consider this code fragment:
template
class A
{
protected:
int f;
};
template
class B: public A
{
public:
B()
{
f = 1; // line 14
}
};
gcc-3.3 has no problem with this, but gcc-3.4 complains
The person you've emailed, Michael ginn, is using Copytalk's spam blocking
service to keep from receiving junk mail.
To verify that you are a real person and not a spam program please follow the
link below. Your original email will be delivered to Michael ginn, and you
will automatically be a
) with ESMTP id
h6ODA6A21430
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:10:06 +1000
Subject: [Bug c++/11645] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Failure to deal with using
and private inheritance
From: Ken Foskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 202696 g++-3.3
Bug#202696: [Bug c++/11645] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Failure to deal with using and
private inheritance
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-3.3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: g++
Version: 3:3.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
There is an upstream fix for gcc 3.3.1 so that OpenOffice.org can
actually compile. This has been committed to the gcc cvs. Could a new
version be released with this feature.
Thanks
KenF
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:ken
>Organization: OpenOffice.org
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Failure to deal with using and private inheritance
>Severity: serious
>Priority:
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.3
ion: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Herbert Valerio Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.3: specialization of private members structs fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:56:17 +0200
Message-Id: <
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10
12:48 ---
Subject: Bug 10849
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10
12:43 ---
Subject: Bug 10849
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-07
15:14 ---
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg00693.html
--- Y
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Targe
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
Summary|[3.3/3.4 regression] Cannot |[3.3 regression] Cannot
|define an out-of-class |define an out-of-class
|specialization of a private
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-06-29 08:44 ---
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/193830]
fyi,
gcc version 3.3.1 2003062
fyi,
gcc version 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease)
(aka '3.3.1-0pre0' in debian)
improves a bit on the situation:
class Foo {
template struct InFoo;
template struct InFoo2;
};
template<>
struct Foo::InFoo {
// ...this works now... (didn't work with 3.3.0)
};
template
struct Foo::InFo
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c++/10887'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c++
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] specialization of private members s
code (which
would compile with previous g++ versions):
$ cat in_class_class.cc
class Foo {
template struct InFoo;
};
template<>
struct Foo::InFoo {
// ...
};
$ g++ -c in_class_class.cc
in_class_class.cc:2: error: `template struct Foo::InFoo' is private
in_class_class.cc:6: error: within this context
$
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
ass.cc
in_class_class.cc:2: error: `template struct Foo::InFoo' is private
in_class_class.cc:6: error: within this context
$
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lfdux.ifs.tuwien.ac.at 2.4.20-1-k7 #1 Sat Mar 22 15:17:52 EST
2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C,
FROM:MRS. M. SESE-SEKO
DEAR FRIEND,
I AM MRS. MARIAM SESE-SEKO WIDOW OF LATE PRESIDENT
MOBUTU SESE-SEKO OF ZAIRE? NOW KNOWN AS DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF CONGO
(DRC). I AM MOVED TO WRITE YOU THIS LETTER, THIS WAS IN
CONFIDENCE
CONSIDERING MY PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE AND SITUATION.
I ESCAPED A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 123861
Bug#123861: forwarded gcc report
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andrea Mennucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Subject: : `ios::ios(const ios &)' is private
Package: g++
Version: 2:2.95.4-8
Severity: normal
hi
I include a piece of code, as first attachment, and the error that I get,
as second attachment
it exemplifies an error that I have already found twice
also, this piece of code compiles
39 matches
Mail list logo
