Bug#423740: Processed: Re: Bug#423740: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: gcjh: Command not found

2007-05-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Montag, 14. Mai 2007 10:28 schrieb Matthias Klose: > please use gjavah, gcjh is obsolete. Where is this documented? Why is there no transition plan? Why does gcjh-4.1 still exist? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#423740: Processed: Re: Bug#423740: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: gcjh: Command not found

2007-05-14 Thread Matthias Klose
clone 423740 -1 reassign 423740 postgresql-pljava thanks please use gjavah, gcjh is obsolete. Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reassign 423740 gcj > Bug#423740: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: gcjh: Command not found > Bug reassigned from package `p

Processed: Re: Bug#423740: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: gcjh: Command not found

2007-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 423740 gcj Bug#423740: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: gcjh: Command not found Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-pljava' to `gcj'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ