On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:56:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:05:48PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > Matthias Klose writes...
> > > Matt Taggart writes:
> > > > IIRC gcc-3.0 is not a woody release goal. However it would be nice
> > > > to get as many packages as possib
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:05:48PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes...
> > Matt Taggart writes:
> > > IIRC gcc-3.0 is not a woody release goal. However it would be nice
> > > to get as many packages as possible gcc-3.0 clean. Those of us
> > > working on the hppa port will certain
Matthias Klose writes...
> Matt Taggart writes:
>
> > IIRC gcc-3.0 is not a woody release goal. However it would be nice
> > to get as many packages as possible gcc-3.0 clean. Those of us
> > working on the hppa port will certainly be working on this.
>
> AFAIK, gcc-3.0 was a release goal. I di
Matt Taggart writes:
> IIRC gcc-3.0 is not a woody release goal. However it would be nice
> to get as many packages as possible gcc-3.0 clean. Those of us
> working on the hppa port will certainly be working on this.
AFAIK, gcc-3.0 was a release goal. I didn't notice that is has been
dropped. Pro
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Since we're using gcc-3.0 for the hppa port I've been running into some
> packages that break with the new compilers. Since hppa is a young port and
> still has some problems I'm often not sure if it's an hppa problem or a
> gcc-3.0 problem. Even if I
Hi debian-gcc,
Since we're using gcc-3.0 for the hppa port I've been running into some
packages that break with the new compilers. Since hppa is a young port and
still has some problems I'm often not sure if it's an hppa problem or a
gcc-3.0 problem. Even if I think it's a gcc-3.0 problem it it
6 matches
Mail list logo
